Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 23:58

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Delta Air Lines Warns Tariffs Could Halt New Airbus Orders & Eliminate Flights - Simple Flying
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 + 4 gets pre-order exclusive demo and a Ninja Turtle - Eurogamer
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Rikishi calls for WWE writers to be fired for botching Jey Uso’s world title run - Cageside Seats
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Will German support for Ukraine decrease after the early elections on February 23, 2025?